alternative

pica vs TuneRegistry

TuneRegistry is worth it if you want to register works with the US organisations it lists, such as ASCAP, BMI, SESAC, SoundExchange and The MLC, from one dashboard for a flat monthly fee. pica does a different job: it holds the record of your songs that the people on them have confirmed, and you work on it through ChatGPT or Claude. many small publishers need the agreed record first and the registration second, and use both.

pica vs TuneRegistry at a glance

feature
tuneregistry
pica
what it is
publishing administration software with registration submissions
the record of your songs that the people on them confirm
to start
flat monthly fee (see its pricing page)
free to start
commission on royalties
none ("no commission on your royalties")
none. pica never takes a cut of what your music earns
submits registrations for you
yes, to the organisations it lists
no. it makes export files you take to your society
organisations covered
US organisations: ASCAP, BMI, SESAC, SoundExchange, The MLC, Harry Fox Agency, Music Reports
not tied to any society

what TuneRegistry is for

music publishing administration software you run yourself. it keeps a catalogue with publishing splits and credits, and submits to ASCAP, BMI, SESAC, SoundExchange, The MLC, Harry Fox Agency, Music Reports and others from one place. it charges a flat monthly fee and takes no commission on your royalties.

what pica is for

the record of your songs that everyone agrees on. you add what you know, each writer, performer and owner confirms their own part, and pica shows what is confirmed, disputed or still missing. you work through ChatGPT or Claude and check on the website. pica makes export files for registering. it doesn't submit registrations or collect royalties.

cost for a small publisher

pica is free to start. TuneRegistry charges a flat monthly fee that depends on the plan; its pricing page has the current figures. neither takes a cut of your royalties.

working with AI

pica connects to ChatGPT, Claude and other apps that support MCP, so you can add songs, update splits and ask co-writers to confirm in plain words. TuneRegistry's site doesn't describe a connection to an AI assistant.

when to pick TuneRegistry

  • you register works with the US organisations TuneRegistry lists and want one dashboard to submit from
  • your splits are already agreed and written down

when to pick pica

  • you need everyone on a song to agree the writers, shares and owners before anything is registered
  • you want to see who has confirmed each detail, and who it is still waiting on
  • you want to manage your songs by talking to ChatGPT or Claude
  • your society isn't one TuneRegistry lists

using both

agree the facts in pica, then register through TuneRegistry or your society. pica's export gives you the agreed writers, shares and codes to work from.

common questions

is TuneRegistry worth it for a small publisher?

it depends on cost, catalogue size and which registrations you need. if you register with the US organisations it lists and want one place to submit, a flat fee with no commission can be good value; check its current plans. if your splits aren't agreed yet, agreeing them first saves correcting registrations later.

do pica or TuneRegistry take a cut of my royalties?

no. TuneRegistry says it takes no commission on your royalties, and pica never takes a cut of what your music earns.

can I use pica and TuneRegistry together?

yes. agree the writers, shares and codes in pica, then use them to register through TuneRegistry or your society.

agree the record first

add one song and ask the people on it to confirm their part.

start with one song